Ravenz wrote:As I notice 13 folk have looked at this post and no-one has replied. It would appear that none of you are willing to admit that Amano Shrimp can and will breed and live to maturity in plain old water. Ok so let me ask you another question then.
Now it has been stated that it can not be done without salt water as they originaly came from salt water and so therefore still require it at a certain stage of there lifecycle.
A question for you shrimpy folk?
There are also many folk that state, Claim that they have bred without the addition of the salt yet this has been rubbished outright and in fact they may as well get burnt as a witch at the stake.
Why do all these newbies think they can come in here with this kind of, less than desirable, "I know it better" attitude, criticize everyone (including me and how I run my forum), don't read any of the threads about breeding these shrimp (especially the ones with freshwater breeding claims) properly (or carefully), provide absolutely no proof of their arguments, DEMAND replies within a couple of hours on a SUNDAY MORNING, complain if they still haven't gotten any replies to their ridiculously worded, unresearched posts, AND think that they are going to be welcome and taken seriously (especially if they feel the need to back up their weak and unresearched arguments with such incredibly irrelevant and vague "credentials" like "background in genealogy and veterinary studies")? Not only is this individual breaking a rule right away with his/her first appearance in the forum ("It just comes across that there are 75% of folk that are not willing to allow into argument..." or "There are also many folk that state, Claim that they have bred without the addition of the salt yet this has been rubbished outright and in fact they may as well get burnt as a witch at the stake.") by criticizing how the forum is run, but he/she is also showing more than enough evidence that no significant research was done. Such people are just wasting everyone's time (especially mine), just like all the other newbies that came in here with similar groundless claims/arguments.
Nobody (at least not me) has claimed that it's *absolutely impossible* that there may be a population of Amano shrimp that has larvae that can complete their development to postlarvae in freshwater. However, that is, up to this point, pure, unqualified speculation. That's why it was stated many times before in this forum that PROOF is needed if someone makes a claim about breeding Amano shrimp in freshwater. This is a scientifically oriented forum and claims without evidence, and instructions to reproduce such claims, are not welcome here. Until a claim can be reproduced, it is just a claim/theory. Such a claim carries more weight if someone with *verifiable* credentials/experience makes such a claim, but it will still remain just a claim without any evidence provided (and so far only newbies/less than knowledgeable people/"false experts" have made the Amano-freshwater-breeding claim). As everyone in the world, who has actually bred these shrimp (and provided evidence obviously), has required saltwater to do so, it would seem that SO FAR the claim/theory that Amano shrimp can complete their life cycle in pure freshwater has not been proven, and one could actually say that it has been disproved. So the current, accepted "theory" is that Amano shrimp require saltwater for their larvae to develop into postlarvae.
If someone makes a claim that goes against the accepted theory, the burden of proof lies on the person making the new, so far unsubstantiated, claim. It's not the other way around. We don't have to disprove such a new claim, as there is no proof of its existence to begin with. If science were as this individual wants it to be, then anyone could just claim anything, without providing any evidence whatsoever, and we would have to accept it until WE disprove it. Am I the only one who sees the ridiculousness of this?
In any case...as this person already comes in with a bad attitude and manages to break a rule, actually two rules if one counts his/her poor research, he/she will be banned outright. This waste of time topic is closed.
Thanks to everyone else for trying to enlighten this person.